Tesla CEO Elon Musk has outlined new reasons to terminate the $44 billion deal to buy Twitter in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Citing a whistleblower report, Musk’s lawyer said the allegations, known to the social media giant but undisclosed to Musk, indicate “far-reaching misconduct at Twitter.”
Elon Musk Presents More Reasons to Terminate Twitter Deal in New SEC Filing
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has found more reasons to terminate his $44 billion offer to buy Twitter Inc. Musk’s lawyer filed a letter he sent to Twitter with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Monday to provide additional notice of termination of the agreement.
In the letter sent to Twitter Chief Legal Officer Vijaya Gadde, Musk’s lawyer detailed:
Allegations regarding certain facts, known to Twitter prior to and as of July 8, 2022, but undisclosed to the Musk parties prior to and at that time, have since come to light that provide additional and distinct bases to terminate the merger agreement.
The letter references a whistleblower report to Congress, the SEC, Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed on July 6 by Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, Twitter’s former chief security officer. The report was recently published in the Washington Post.
Musk’s lawyer claimed that “The Zatko complaint alleges far-reaching misconduct at Twitter — all of which was disclosed to Twitter’s directors and senior executives, including [CEO] Parag Agrawal — that is likely to have severe consequences for Twitter’s business.”
For example, Zatko alleged that “Twitter is in material noncompliance” under data privacy, unfair trade practice, and consumer protection laws and regulations. Moreover, he said Twitter has been violating a consent decree it entered into with the FTC in 2011.
Alleging that “Twitter’s platform is built in significant part on the misappropriation and infringement of third party intellectual property,” the whistleblower claimed:
Twitter is uniquely vulnerable to systemic disruption resulting from data center failures or malicious actors, a fact which Twitter leadership (including its CEO) have ignored and sought to obfuscate.
Moreover, Zatko explained that “Twitter’s SEC filings contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts necessary to make the statements therein not misleading.”
He further alleged that “Twitter’s CEO, Parag Agrawal, knowingly presented false and misleading reports to Twitter’s board of directors in order to cover up flagrant vulnerabilities in Twitter’s security and data protection infrastructure.”
A number of authorities in various countries are currently investigating the allegations by Zatko, Musk’s lawyer conveyed, adding:
Twitter will also now face a myriad of civil lawsuits, asserting claims pursuant to various privacy and cybersecurity laws, state consumer protection laws, false advertising laws, intellectual property theft and misappropriation and common law claims, such as unjust enrichment, fraud, and breach of contract.
There are also issues of intellectual property. The whistleblower revealed that “Twitter apparently never acquired the rights to Twitter’s core machine learning models, which the Musk Parties understand to be fundamental to the Twitter platform itself,” Musk’s lawyer wrote.
The case is scheduled to go to trial in the Delaware Chancery Court for five days beginning Oct. 17. However, Musk’s legal team is seeking to delay the trial by a month in light of the whistleblower disclosure.
Do you think Elon Musk has enough reasons to walk away from the $44 billion deal to buy Twitter? Let us know in the comments section below.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.